Mapping: Space & Elements

Group Brainstorm: Mats
Research Text: Daughters of Sina
Penelope Schoeffel: Daughters of Sina: A study of Gender, Status and Power in Western Samoa (1979)
The enquiry into Samoan notions of gender, status and power below, is offered by Penelope Schoeffel. It is a Doctoral thesis that explores two female status groups (the sacred sisters and the secular wives) within in Samoan society. It was submitted in 1979, to Australian National University.
Daughters of Sina: A study of Gender, Status and Power in Western Samoa
Abstract:
The dyadic structure of Samoan society is based upon a concept of power comprising two complementary aspects; sacred and secular. These divisions operate as fundamental ordering principles in society. Power, in the sense of the ability to exert moral suasion and authority, is perceived as the combination of secular action and sacred legitimation. This duality derives from beliefs about the origin of society; that sacred power originated through matrilineal descent lines from the creator deity to dignify secular power, and is maintained through a predominately patrilineal mode of inheritance.
Thus the focal dyad is the kinship of a sister and brother, and a number of other important dyadic relationships are metaphorically derived from it. The division of power into two aspects does not focus, symbolically or otherwise, upon male and female, but upon an opposition of qualities ascribed to particular statuses. Samoan females have two distinct statuses which are usually held simultaneously but exercised in different contexts. As sisters this status is sacred relative to the secular status of their brothers. As wives their status is secular relative to the sacred status of their husband’s descent group and is also derived from the status of their husband in that descent group. Similarly the designation of male statuses as sacred or secular is contextually defined, according to the rank and status of a title or descent group, and by categories of kinship with respect to a descent group on the basis of ancestral cross-sex siblingship. Since 1830, Christianity has eroded aspects of Samoan social structure and, together with the new avenues for acquiring wealth and prestige, has blurred many of the fundamental distinctions on which the complementarity of secular and secular power rest.
Despite change and modification, the traditional concept of power is still reflected in kinship and village institutions. One of the most interesting manifestations of change and continuity is the introduction of village womens committees since the 1920s. These have adopted a tripartite structure which maintains distinctions between the wives of titled and untitled men, but more importantly, maintains the distinction between sisters and wives in the context of the local community. This distinction supports a complementarity between sacred and secular aspects of power, as exercised collectively by the two female status groups within a institutional framework.
The persistence of patterns of belief, action and social institutions, even after the ancient religious ideology which justified them has been formally abandoned, is illustrated by the way in which an innovation such as the Western Samoan village womens committee has developed. This evidence has particularly significant implications for planned change and economic development in small-scale societies.
Research Text: Potential of Va
The Potential of Vā
“An investigation of how ‘Ie Tōga activate the spatial relationships of the Vā, for a Samoan Diaspora community“
1.0 Abstract
The Vā is our past, present, and future. As much as we might want to de ne the Vā – it certainly de nes us. It does not appear as a physical form. It is never vacant. The Vā connects us all through our relationships as a space that always already exists, whether we think about it or not, and even when we feel discon- nected. It appears most strongly when we meet and practice Samoan ceremo- nial exchange.
The Samoan dictionary de nes Vā as “separated, be divided, estranged – on bad terms, space, distance between, and relationship” (Milner, 2003). For my thesis, Vā is a relational space whose potential for the creation of spaces of display I will test. My project seeks to discover ways of creating communities, which nurture fa’asamoa (Samoan ways) in the diaspora. The Vā has the po- tential to create spaces of display – not necessarily lasting buildings: in Samo- an culture, and Oceanic culture more generally, “space is indissolubly linked to time” (Tcherkézoff, 2008, p. 136). It is in these contexts that the project seeks to discover ways of creating communities, nurturing fa’asamoa, Samoan ways, in the diaspora.
The project examines the associations and ancestral connections of ‘Ie Tōga (Samoan ne mats) within their communities. It explores the relationships created through the exchange of historical ‘Ie Tōga, making visible their place in the Vā and how they activate it by presenting to us our past, present, and future. The design proposal is the creation of a space of display arising from the processes of Lalaga (weaving) and Lalava (according to Albert Reftiti in personal communication (2010), “stirring the Vā” is a literal translation of, Lala-Vā, lashing). In this case, the combination lead to a stirring and re- connecting of the relationships within diasporic space. The thesis will test the potential of Vā through various methods of experimentation, such as archival research, participation, documentation of images and mapping.
Benita Sharon Simati Kumar.
Masters of Art and Design. 2011. Primary Supervisor:
Dr. Tina Engels-Schwarzpaul
Site Analysis: Drawings
MY ANALYSIS: H O M E I N V A S I O N

My journey through the gallery spaces: was based on the thought process and idea of walking through a “Home”. Though the idea of home and gallery may differ to its intent. Somehow I see similarity, my “Home” is obviously not a gallery space, but the living room maybe held for the intent of display, the only space where people can actually have free accessibility as its the only area we keep “clean” or gather. The Living room, where formal and casual conversations occur, a place that comes first before the other rooms.
The moral or custom tradition that is outplayed within the living room, is to take off your shoes at the door, why? well who wants dirty footprints on a clean carpet? also its a familiar gesture we all share? But why? shoes are for outdoors, the entrance, the door is a threshold. which separates the intent of what outside is suppose to be and the inside as well. The key elements of the Living Room: display the resonances the gallery 1 and 2 had, reminded me of my “island home” (Edith Amituanais “What it means to make a home”). The consistent displays of tv and the hanging sheets of historical and cultural context was very interesting, the idea of bringing home into home.
Precendent:
“Edith Amituanai’s photographs reflect her ongoing fascination with what it means to make a home”
https://edithamituanai.com/INTERIORS-ANCHORAGE-APIA-AKL
EDITH AMITUANAI
” Edith’s process of constructing images could be considered anthropological studies. Her practice questions how notions of home migrate from one place to another, as well as from one generation to the next. Domestic interiors in particular feature as transitional sites; places where occupants gather together select objects of varied cultural significance.”
Stories of migration are prominent in Edith’s work. Edith travelled to Europe to photograph Samoan rugby players living in Italy and France. Her resulting series, Dejeuner, includes portraits of the young sportsmen on the rugby field along with photographs of the family homes the players have left behind. Together, these images tell the two sides of migration; those who seek better lives in foreign lands, and those who stay behind. The interiors, in particular, emanate a sense of longing. The House of Tiatia, 2007, for instance, is brim with objects that evoke an absent son: a framed rugby jersey, casually hung medals and club photographs lined up in a row stand in his place.
http://www.tatai.org/artist/edith-amituanai






Speaking surfaces: Traditional Mats
Traditional Layouts

Key? Speaking surfaces
KEY REMINDER IMPORTANCES: BRIEF
The exhibition aims to create a dynamic, welcoming and functional space as a platform for encounters: “exhibitions, conversations, performances, gatherings, screenings and teachings.”
Encounters: What I think encounters mean? to engage with something, to meet and be introduced too or into. Encounters are usually personal or with a group. You sometimes encounter objects collectively. I feel like spatially encounters should be new and fresh something that should be introduced to us. Engaging with something new and different. To see beyond or step into something intimately. Which should include exhibits, conversations, performances, gatherings, screenings, teachings.
Contamination as Collaboration:
Contamination as Collaboration is a reading in which I was given to read for my minor class which is contemporary pacific. Which I feel may have resonance towards the current studio brief?. My minor class has really exposed me to a lot of contemporary work and exhibitions, politics, colonialism, post-colonial body, history, culture etc..
Tsing, A. (2015), The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press
” I wanted someone to tell e things were going to fine, but no one did.” – Mai Neug Mona, “Along the way to the Mekong”
My Review: The way in which the author has viewed contamination as collaboration seemed as though the idea is very much connecting, spreading, developing and growing. It seems to be more of a deepened and broad context than food. It’s as if one factor needs another and the other needs support to maintain a cycle or maybe showing us that this may have been the result of our collaborative mistakes. The author quoted ” We are contaminated by our encounters; they change who were are as we make way for others.” was quite clear, seeing this in active form we become contaminated unknowingly as well, not disease but communication and thought, intention and maybe this contaminant allowed this diversity and history. The little unseen moments we don’t take awareness of. I think individualist are contaminated, they are caused by self contamination, but is there self contamination based on their encounter based collaboration?. Its makes the viewer become reflective. Contamination is quite terrifying to mention,ts something that is poisonous, hazardous, polluting. but collaboration, seems quite toxic to gather in. How successful has it been politically? culturally? Morally? How hard it must be for our now society to have intake on this. Theres a huge contrast between this text and a text we do today. It simplifies the reality.
“How can the gallery, as a place and space, “ARTICULATE THROUGH ARRANGEMENT NARRATIVE AND SPATIALIZATION”
How do interior surfaces speak?: Depends on what the materiality is and its texture or its possibilities? Deterioration of a surface, the freshness of the surface, placement or the fidgetiness of the outcome of the surface, finger prints, marks left from any other contact? What is left on the surface, what is forgotten?
How are cultural stories and forces inscribed(marked with characters) in the surfaces around us?:

The Art of Tatauing – or more correctly, the way of life that is tatauing- had to survive the “onslaught the missionary condemnation and colonialism?.
-Pain of Tatau is a endurance to prepare for life, it recognises its growth maturity and ability to serve the community.
One example could be the essay written by Albert Wendt in which I was introduced too by my minor class which was contemporary pacific. The essay is quite humorous and more fluidly understood. Because the author is Samoan theres an ownership in which I hugely respect. Albert Wendt sees post colonial body as a becoming or defining itself. The body being submerged in a blend of local and nationalism that is influenced from outside and within. A body defining itself. coming out of the pacific, not a body being imposed on the Pacific. He identifies this post colonial body by seeing a well built Samoan guy walking down queen street with blue sport shorts, blue t-shirt with cropped hair, reeboks, eating a hamburger and showing his tatau off. Reflectively, growing up my parents are both Samoan but both brought us up differently which I realise now what all the bickering was about. Both my parents are total opposites, both born and raised in Samoa and yet both individually brought us up differently. My mother disliked the Fa’a Samoan way so she brought us up in the “palagi way”, whereas my dad lives the Fa’a Samoan way and he tried to teach us about it, but us kids became too palagi that it was too late. But I would say there has been a shift, my dad cleans and looks after the house and has taken the female role, and my mum works and provides, which is a huge shift.
How has this interplay manifested historically? What novelties and continuities are there in contemporary articulation of surface and orality? How has this interplay manifested historically?
The Gallery as a space of power: What do non- colonial and non-patriarchal spaces feel like?
” The agenda was to make the ‘public’ understand themselves as “both the subjects of knowledge” through the creation of a “set of cultural technologies concerned to organise a voluntary self-regulating citizenry” (Bennett 1996, 84)
” Speaking Surfaces responds to these histories of social control”
Social Control? What are we now sharing or exhibiting in galleries, or art spaces? Why is there a control over exhibitions? Are we being wise on what we show? How important is our design moves or decisions of what we display or allow people to encounter with?
Spatial Layout?



















































































